Thanks, my friend. That's the sneaky part: the rituals feel like discipline, which is exactly what makes them hard to touch. Will be curious to hear which ones you're reconsidering.
There's real humility in writing about the biases you can name yet still feel gripped by. That's a rare thing to admit publicly, and it makes the argument far more persuasive than any tidy "here's how to adapt" checklist would. Thanks for turning the analytical lens inward instead of outward. ✌🏽
Thank you. Honestly this one was as much a note to myself as anything. Naming the bias doesn't dissolve it, but writing it down in public at least makes it harder to pretend I don't see it.
This post reminds me of Munger's Talk Eleven: The Psychology of Human Misjudgment in "Poor Charlie’s Almanack." It's a speech I reference often and re-read yearly. You've likely read it but recommend if not.
Good stuff, David. Has me rethinking some of my rituals.
Thanks, my friend. That's the sneaky part: the rituals feel like discipline, which is exactly what makes them hard to touch. Will be curious to hear which ones you're reconsidering.
And by the way, you had as close up view of part of this story than any!
There's real humility in writing about the biases you can name yet still feel gripped by. That's a rare thing to admit publicly, and it makes the argument far more persuasive than any tidy "here's how to adapt" checklist would. Thanks for turning the analytical lens inward instead of outward. ✌🏽
Thank you. Honestly this one was as much a note to myself as anything. Naming the bias doesn't dissolve it, but writing it down in public at least makes it harder to pretend I don't see it.
This post reminds me of Munger's Talk Eleven: The Psychology of Human Misjudgment in "Poor Charlie’s Almanack." It's a speech I reference often and re-read yearly. You've likely read it but recommend if not.
https://www.stripe.press/poor-charlies-almanack/talk-eleven?progress=0.00%
Know of, but will now really read. Thanks for the rec, Chacho.